JAAHA Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meurs, K.
Right arrow Articles by Slater, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meurs, K.
Right arrow Articles by Slater, M.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, Vol 32, Issue 6, 471-475
Copyright © 1996 by American Animal Hospital Association


Articles

Comparison of the indirect oscillometric and direct arterial methods for blood pressure measurements in anesthetized dogs

KM Meurs, MW Miller, and MR Slater

The indirect oscillometric method of blood pressure measurement was compared to the direct arterial puncture method in 15 anesthetized dogs, divided into three weight groups, undergoing a variety of surgical procedures. The objectives of this study were to determine the accuracy of the indirect oscillometric method at a single point in time and when sequential values were averaged. Additionally, the ability to detect systemic hypotension (i.e., mean systemic arterial pressure less than 60 mmHg) was evaluated. The method had the highest correlation coefficient (r of 0.8) when five sequential values were averaged and compared, and it appeared to be sensitive (100%) and specific (91%) for detecting hypotension.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Animal Hospital Association.