JAAHA Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eich, C.
Right arrow Articles by Heeb, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eich, C.
Right arrow Articles by Heeb, L.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, Vol 36, Issue 1, 16-18
Copyright © 2000 by American Animal Hospital Association


Articles

The accuracy of intraoperative cytopathological diagnosis compared with conventional histopathological diagnosis

CS Eich, JG Whitehair, SD Moroff, and LA Heeb

To determine the accuracy of intraoperative cytopathological diagnosis compared with conventional histopathological diagnosis, the authors obtained 100 specimens from masses of various organ systems chosen randomly from 65 dogs, 30 cats, and five exotic animals. Of the 100 specimens, a specific diagnosis was obtained in 42%, the correct pathological process (i.e., mesenchymal neoplasia, epithelial neoplasia, round cell neoplasia, or inflammation) was identified in 41%, in 1% the diagnosis was deferred, and in 16% an incorrect diagnosis was obtained. The overall accuracy rate of intraoperative cytopathological examination was 83%, which increased to 90% by the exclusion of splenic masses. The accuracy rate of diagnosing neoplasia was 87%, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 100%. Intraoperative cytopathological examination is an accurate diagnostic method with good sensitivity and specificity for the identification of neoplasia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
R. D. F. Strefezzi, J. G. Xavier, and J. L. Catao-Dias
Morphometry of Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors
Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2003; 40(3): 268 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
J. D. DeBerry, C. R. Norris, V. F. Samii, S. M. Griffey, and F. S. Almy
Correlation Between Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology and Histopathology of the Lung in Dogs and Cats
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., July 1, 2002; 38(4): 327 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Animal Hospital Association.