JAAHA Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitch, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hosgood, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fitch, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hosgood, G
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, Vol 36, Issue 1, 68-74
Copyright © 2000 by American Animal Hospital Association


Articles

Caudal cervical intervertebral disk disease in the small dog: role of distraction and stabilization in ventral slot decompression

RB Fitch, SC Kerwin, and G Hosgood

The clinical outcomes in 112 dogs weighing less than 35 pounds that were presented with cervical intervertebral disk protrusions were retrospectively evaluated. Although the second to third cervical (C2 to C3) intervertebral space was the most common site (27%) of disk protrusion, 57% of disk protrusions presented were caudal to the fourth cervical (C4) vertebra. Dogs with cranial intervertebral disk protrusions, including the C2 to C3 and C3 to C4 intervertebral disk spaces, responded favorably to ventral slot decompression. By comparison, caudal intervertebral disk protrusions (within the C4 to the seventh cervical [C7] intervertebral disk spaces) responded less favorably to ventral slot decompression, demonstrating significantly more severe clinical effects in motor function, comfort, recovery, and long-term outcome following surgery. Significant improvement in clinical results was seen in caudal disk protrusions when additional surgical distraction and stabilization were provided following ventral slot decompression.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
T. M. Ryan, S. R. Platt, F. J. Llabres-Diaz, J. F. McConnell, and V. J. Adams
Detection of spinal cord compression in dogs with cervical intervertebral disc disease by magnetic resonance imaging
Vet Rec., July 5, 2008; 163(1): 11 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
K. L. Cherrone, C. W. Dewey, J. R. Coates, and R. L. Bergman
A Retrospective Comparison of Cervical Intervertebral Disk Disease in Nonchondrodystrophic Large Dogs Versus Small Dogs
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., July 1, 2004; 40(4): 316 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Animal Hospital Association.