JAAHA Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinton, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Weisbrode, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hinton, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Weisbrode, S. E.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 38:176-187 (2002)
© 2002 American Animal Hospital Association


Retrospective Study

Spontaneous Gastroduodenal Perforation in 16 Dogs and Seven Cats (1982–1999)

Laura E. Hinton, DVM, Mary A. McLoughlin, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS, Susan E. Johnson, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVIM and Steven E. Weisbrode, VMD, PhD, Diplomate ACVP

From the Departments of Veterinary Clinical Sciences (Hinton, McLoughlin, Johnson) and Veterinary Biosciences (Weisbrode), College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, 601 Vernon L. Tharp Street, Columbus, Ohio 43210.

The records of 23 dogs and cats diagnosed with spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation (GDP) were retrospectively reviewed. Survival was 63% in dogs and 14% in cats. Rottweilers <5 years of age were overrepresented. Clinical evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was common in dogs but not in cats. Shock was an uncommon presenting condition in dogs and was not closely linked to outcome. In fact, progression of an ulcerating lesion to GDP was not associated with marked changes in symptoms exhibited by many patients in this study. Most GDPs were associated with histopathological evidence of subacute or chronic peritoneal reaction at the time of diagnosis. This suggests that diagnostic methods employed lacked sensitivity in identifying early perforating lesions, and that dramatic signs of acute abdomen following gastroduodenal perforation may not be as common as was previously thought.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
G. E. Pastore, C. R. Lamb, and V. Lipscomb
Comparison of the Results of Abdominal Ultrasonography and Exploratory Laparotomy in the Dog and Cat
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 43(5): 264 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
J. E. Waldrop, E. A. Rozanski, L. M. Freeman, and J. E. Rush
Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Dogs With Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: 55 Cases (1999-2001)
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., November 1, 2003; 39(6): 523 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Animal Hospital Association.