JAAHA Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hackett, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lappin, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hackett, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lappin, M. R.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 39:52-56 (2003)
© 2003 American Animal Hospital Association

Original Article

Prevalence of Enteric Pathogens in Dogs of North-Central Colorado

Tim Hackett, DVM, MS and Michael R. Lappin, DVM, PhD, Diplomate ACVIM

From the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523.

Address all reprint requests to Dr. Hackett.

To evaluate the prevalence of enteric pathogens in dogs of north-central Colorado, fecal samples were obtained from client-owned dogs presented to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital at Colorado State University for evaluation of acute small-bowel, large-bowel, or mixed-bowel diarrhea (n=71) and from age-matched, client-owned, healthy dogs (n=59). Infectious agents potentially associated with gastrointestinal disease were detected in 34 of 130 (26.1%) fecal samples. Agents with zoonotic potential were detected in feces from 21 (16.2%) of 130 dogs and included Giardia spp. (5.4%), Cryptosporidium parvum (3.8%), Toxocara canis (3.1%), Salmonella spp. (2.3%), Ancylostoma caninum (0.8%), and Campylobacter jejuni (0.8%). Positive test results occurred in dogs with or without gastrointestinal signs of disease. Dogs, particularly those in homes of immunocompromised humans, should be evaluated for enteric zoonotic agents.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Trop Med HygHome page
P. J. Lupo, R. C. Langer-Curry, M. Robinson, P. C. Okhuysen, and C. L. Chappell
Cryptosporidium muris in a Texas Canine Population
Am J Trop Med Hyg, June 1, 2008; 78(6): 917 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Vet Rec.Home page
C. Westgarth, G. L. Pinchbeck, J. W. S. Bradshaw, S. Dawson, R. M. Gaskell, and R. M. Christley
Dog-human and dog-dog interactions of 260 dog-owning households in a community in Cheshire
Vet Rec., April 5, 2008; 162(14): 436 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Vet Rec.Home page
K. Hubbard, B. J. Skelly, J. McKelvie, and J. L. N. Wood
Risk of vomiting and diarrhoea in dogs
Vet Rec., December 1, 2007; 161(22): 755 - 757.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
J. Benyacoub, P. F. Perez, F. Rochat, K. Y. Saudan, G. Reuteler, N. Antille, M. Humen, G. L. De Antoni, C. Cavadini, S. Blum, et al.
Enterococcus faecium SF68 Enhances the Immune Response to Giardia intestinalis in Mice
J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1171 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Animal Hospital Association.