JAAHA Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winkler, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ballagas, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winkler, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ballagas, A. J.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 39:169-185 (2003)
© 2003 American Animal Hospital Association


Retrospective Study

Portosystemic Shunts: Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of 64 Cases (1993–2001)

James T. Winkler, DVM, Mark W. Bohling, DVM, D. Michael Tillson, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS, James C. Wright, DVM, PhD, Diplomate ACVPM and Antonio J. Ballagas, DVM

From the Departments of Clinical Sciences (Winkler, Bohling, Tillson, Ballagas) and Pathobiology (Wright), College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849–5523.

Cases diagnosed with portosystemic shunting between the years 1993 and 2001 were reviewed. Sensitivities of screening tests and abdominal ultrasonographic evaluation for the detection of portosystemic shunting were evaluated. Prognosis for surgically treated shunts was also evaluated. Results indicated that both paired serum bile acids and blood ammonia levels were useful screening tests for portosystemic shunting. However, paired bile acid tests were significantly more sensitive than blood ammonia levels. Overall postoperative mortality rates for extrahepatic shunts and intrahepatic shunts were 8.7% and 20%, respectively. Postoperative mortality rates were slightly higher for animals treated with partial ligation when compared to those treated with ameroid ring placement, although this did not reach statistical significance. Long-term complication rates for animals with single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts treated with complete ligation, ameroid ring placement, and partial ligation alone were 9%, 15.4%, and 42%, respectively. Animals >2 years of age with extrahepatic shunts had almost identical postoperative mortality and long-term complication rates as animals <=2 years of age. No animal in this study had paired bile acid samples within the reference range postoperatively, indicating continued abnormal liver function after surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
R. C. Windsor and N. J. Olby
Congenital Portosystemic Shunts in Five Mature Dogs With Neurological Signs
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 43(6): 322 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Animal Hospital Association.