JAAHA Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glaus, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keene, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glaus, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keene, B. W.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 39:237-239 (2003)
© 2003 American Animal Hospital Association


Original Article

Accuracy of Heart Rate Obtained by Auscultation in Atrial Fibrillation

Tony M. Glaus, Dr. med. vet., Diplomate ACVIM, Michael Hässig, Dr. med. vet., PhD and Bruce W. Keene, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVIM (Cardiology)

From the Division of Cardiology (Glaus), Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine and the Division of Herd Health (Hässig), Department of Reproduction, Animal Hospital, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 260, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland and the Department of Cardiology (Keene), College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606.

The accuracy of heart rate estimation by cardiac auscultation over a 15-second period, and the influence of clinical experience on accuracy were evaluated in a dog with chronic atrial fibrillation by test subjects of varying experience. Only 30% of all test subjects provided accurate heart rate estimates. Board-certified specialists, medicine residents, and experienced nurses were significantly more accurate in their estimates than surgery residents and students. Accurate estimates were provided by 12.5% of surgery residents and students, as opposed to 64% of the other test subjects. Auscultatory estimates of heart rate in atrial fibrillation may be significantly inaccurate, and under some circumstances they may not provide a sound basis for making clinical decisions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Animal Hospital Association.