JAAHA Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fascetti, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fascetti, A. J.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 42:197-206 (2006)
© 2006 American Animal Hospital Association


Retrospective Study

Complications and Outcomes of One-Step Low-Profile Gastrostomy Devices for Long-Term Enteral Feeding in Dogs and Cats

Scott J. Campbell, BVSc, MACVSc, Diplomate ACVN, Stanley L. Marks, BVSc, PhD, Diplomate ACVIM, Diplomate ACVN, Sean K. Yoshimoto, DVM, Diplomate ACVIM, Darlene L. Riel, RVT and Andrea J. Fascetti, VMD, PhD, Diplomate ACVIM, Diplomate ACVN

From the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital (Campbell, Yoshimoto, Riel), the Department of Medicine and Epidemiology (Marks), and the Department of Molecular Biosciences (Fascetti), School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616.

Address all correspondence to Dr. Marks.

Sixteen dogs and cats with a variety of primary diseases were retrospectively evaluated following endoscopic placement of a one-step low-profile gastrostomy device. Overall, the devices were well tolerated, with most complications being minor in nature. Complications included bloody or purulent peristomal discharge, peristomal swelling, peristomal inflammation, discomfort associated with the device, leaking through the device, chewing at the device, premature removal of the device, peritonitis, and aspiration pneumonia. Dogs survived for up to 2241 days, and cats survived for up to 593 days after initial device placement. The median survival time after device insertion for dogs was 89 days, and for cats it was 87 days.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Animal Hospital Association.